Seminar: Privacy vs. Security

Thursday, 24 November, 2016, 5:30pm – 7pm.

St Cross Room, St Cross College, University of Oxford, 61 St Giles, Oxford OX1 3LZ

When duties arising from two different rights are incompatible with one another, the rights in question can be said to be in conflict. Public discourse at the moment is flooded with claims about the incompatibility between privacy and security. According to popular belief, the more privacy individuals enjoy, the less the state is able to provide security, and vice versa. In other words, the state seems to have incompatible duties: on the one hand, to respect its citizens’ right to privacy by refraining from spying on them, and on the other hand, to guarantee the safety of its citizens, their right to security, which, so the argument goes, cannot be done without spying on the general population. This paper focuses on the supposed trade-off between privacy and security in the context of terrorist threats and mass surveillance. I will follow Waldron’s (1989) framework for assessing rights in conflict by first weighing security against privacy—assessing the importance of the interests at stake, the trade-offs involved and the possible successive waves of duties generated by the failure to comply with a primary duty, and the need for proportionality—and finally focusing on possible internal connections between privacy and security that may suggest these rights are less in conflict than is usually thought. The paper ends with some reflections on the implications for encryption.

Speaker: Carissa Véliz is a DPhil candidate at the Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics and at the Faculty of Philosophy at the University of Oxford. She is currently finishing her dissertation on privacy. She has been the recipient of numerous academic awards, including the National Award for Excellence in Academic Performance (awarded by the Spanish Ministry of Education to the top three philosophers in the country). Her work has appeared in a number of media outlets, including The Guardian, Slate, the BBC, the Huffington Post, and the Daily Mail.

Booking is required:


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s